BOOK A CONSULTATION

Enforceability of Mediation Agreements in Family Law

Lessons from Loss v. Walters

The case of Loss v. Walters, 2024 BCSC 1012, decided by the British Columbia Supreme Court, touches on important aspects of the enforceability of mediation agreements in family law. The court’s analysis focused on whether the mediation agreement between the Claimant and the Respondent was binding and whether it should be set aside under section 93 of the Family Law Act (FLA) if it was enforceable. For more information on family law mediation, you can visit our Family Law Mediation page.

Background of the Case

The Claimant and the Respondent, who had a lengthy relationship and shared children, faced unresolved issues regarding the division of their property and business interests after their separation. They participated in a mediation in July 2021 to address these disputes. However, the resulting mediation agreement became contentious, with the Respondent seeking its enforcement and the Claimant challenging its validity.

Enforceability of the July 2021 Mediation Agreement

The court examined whether a binding and enforceable agreement was reached during the mediation:

    • The Claimant argued that essential terms regarding leases and business operations were not settled, rendering the agreement incomplete and non-binding.
    • The Respondent asserted that the agreement was comprehensive and should be enforced as a final settlement.

Alternative Analysis Under Section 93 of the FLA

If deemed enforceable, the court considered whether the agreement should be set aside under s. 93 of the FLA, which addresses circumstances such as:

    • Failure to disclose relevant information
    • Taking improper advantage of vulnerability
    • Lack of understanding of the agreement’s nature and consequences

Court’s Analysis and Findings

Enforceability of the Mediation Agreement

The court determined that the July 2021 Mediation Agreement was not a final and enforceable contract. Essential terms, particularly those concerning the Claimant’s right to live in the Cabin and operate the campground, were ambiguous and contingent on future agreements. Therefore, the agreement lacked the necessary clarity and completeness to be considered binding.

Analysis Under Section 93 of the FLA

Failure to Disclose (s. 93(3)(a))

The court found that there was a lack of significant disclosure, including updated property values and business valuations. This failure to provide complete financial information undermined the integrity of the mediation process.

Improper Advantage of Vulnerability (s. 93(3)(b))

The Claimant claimed she was under duress and suffering from PTSD due to a recent forest fire. However, the court did not find sufficient evidence that the Respondent took improper advantage of her vulnerability during the mediation.

Lack of Understanding (s. 93(3)(c))

The court was persuaded that the Claimant did not fully understand the nature or consequences of the agreement. This was attributed to the combination of several factors: inadequate legal representation during the mediation, the chaotic circumstances at the time, and the insufficient communication from her lawyer.

Conclusion and Orders

The court concluded that the July 2021 Mediation Agreement was not enforceable due to its lack of clear and settled terms. Additionally, even if it were enforceable, the court would have set it aside under s. 93 of the FLA based on the Claimant’s lack of understanding of the agreement, taking into account the totality of the factors mentioned.

Implications for Future Cases

Loss v. Walters underscores the importance of ensuring that mediation agreements in family law are comprehensive, clear, and understood by all parties involved. It highlights the necessity of full disclosure and the importance of considering the totality of circumstances, including the adequacy of legal representation, during mediation. The case demonstrates the court’s willingness to scrutinize such agreements for fairness and to protect vulnerable parties from potential exploitation.

For those involved in family law disputes, this case emphasizes the need for thorough preparation, clear communication, and comprehensive legal support during mediation to achieve a binding and fair settlement. For more insights on family law mediation, visit our Family Law Mediation page.

author avatar
Domenic Maio
Domenic Maio

Domenic Maio

Barrister and Solicitor

Lawyer practicing in the areas of Family Law, Wills, and Corporate.

Recent Posts

Maio Law Professional Corporation

Expertise, leadership & excellence you can count on.

Call 888.586.3204 now or complete the following form to schedule your consultation with a legal expert.

Contacting the firm via the website or e-mail does not constitute a solicitor/client relationship of any kind. Any correspondence entered into here shall not to be construed as legal advice, but merely as providing a vehicle to contact Maio Law Professional Corporation in a direct and timely fashion. Confidential documentation or information should not be sent to the firm electronically until a retainer has been confirmed.


Contact Us